I'm a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for me to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
If you’re looking for Shark CryoGlow vs Solawave Mask, you’re not looking for “both are great.” You’re trying to avoid buying a pretty gadget that ends up living in a drawer.
Quick Verdict:
- Buy Shark CryoGlow if you want the most “I can feel this working” experience (under-eye cooling) + a true multi-goal mask (acne + aging + glow) with short, guided programs.
- Buy Solawave Wrinkle Retreat Pro if you want a softer, flexible silicone mask with more published technical specs (LED count, irradiance/fluence) and a fast 3-minute routine you’ll actually stick to.
My takeaway: CryoGlow wins for people who are chasing puffiness + visible “tired face” issues. Solawave wins for people who want a simple anti-aging ritual and care about published device metrics more than add-on features.
Shark CryoGlow vs Solawave Mask: Comparison Table
| Feature | Shark CryoGlow | Solawave Wrinkle Retreat Pro |
|---|---|---|
 |  | |
| Best for | Puffiness + acne + early aging (multi-goal) | Anti-aging ritual + spec-forward shoppers |
| Key wavelengths | Blue 415nm; Red 630nm; IR 830nm | Amber 605nm; Red 630nm; Deep Red 660nm; NIR 830nm |
| Session time | 4–8 min LED modes; 5–15 min cooling | 3 min per session |
| Frequency | Brand positions LED routines for daily use | 3–5x/week |
| Signature feature | Under-eye cooling (de-puff “instant payoff”) | Flexible silicone + published irradiance/fluence |
| Published LED count | 480 light sources reported in some coverage; FDA doc includes wavelength/dose details | 320 LEDs (160 dual-core chips) |
| “Will I actually use it?” factor | Cooling makes it habit-forming, but bulk/noise can annoy | 3 minutes is almost impossible to talk yourself out of |
| Price |  | |
What Top Reviews Miss, and How We Beat Them
Most competitor pages fail in the same predictable ways:
- They compare “features” but ignore adherence.
LED works when you use it consistently. The real question is: which one will fit into your life without friction? - They don’t show the specs that matter (or they bury them).
Solawave publishes irradiance and fluence; most reviews don’t translate what that means for results or session length. - They gloss over blue-light nuance.
Blue can be helpful for breakouts, but it’s not “set it and forget it” for everyone—especially if you’re prone to post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. - They don’t compare session design.
CryoGlow is built around short, specific modes (4–8 minutes) plus optional cooling (5–15). Solawave is engineered around a fast 3-minute dose, 3–5x/week. That difference decides your results more than the marketing does.
This review fixes that by comparing: routine fit, skin goals, comfort, published specs, and “why you’ll stop using it.”
Quick facts (what you’re really comparing)
Shark CryoGlow (what it’s built for)
- Tri-wavelength LED: blue 415nm, red 630nm, infrared 830nm
- Short preset sessions: Glow Enhancement (4 min), Better Aging (6 min), Skin Clearing (8 min) + Under-Eye Revive cooling (5–15 min)
- Designed for daily LED routines (brand guidance)
Solawave Wrinkle Retreat Pro (what it’s built for)
- Four wavelengths: amber 605nm, red 630nm, deep red 660nm, near-infrared 830nm
- Published specs that most brands don’t share: 320 LEDs (160 dual-core), irradiance 65 mW/cm², fluence 11.7 J/cm² (3-minute treatment)
- Routine format: 3 minutes per session, 3–5x per week
| Feature | Shark CryoGlow | Solawave Wrinkle Retreat Pro |
|---|---|---|
| | |
| Best for | Puffiness + acne + early aging (multi-goal) | Anti-aging ritual + spec-forward shoppers |
| Key wavelengths | Blue 415nm; Red 630nm; IR 830nm | Amber 605nm; Red 630nm; Deep Red 660nm; NIR 830nm |
| Session time | 4–8 min LED modes; 5–15 min cooling | 3 min per session |
| Frequency | Brand positions LED routines for daily use | 3–5x/week |
| Signature feature | Under-eye cooling (de-puff “instant payoff”) | Flexible silicone + published irradiance/fluence |
| Published LED count | 480 light sources reported in some coverage; FDA doc includes wavelength/dose details | 320 LEDs (160 dual-core chips) |
| “Will I actually use it?” factor | Cooling makes it habit-forming, but bulk/noise can annoy | 3 minutes is almost impossible to talk yourself out of |
| Price | | |
What’s the real difference on your face?
Shark CryoGlow feels like: “I look less tired.”
CryoGlow’s unfair advantage is that it gives you something immediate: cooling that visibly calms morning puffiness (or that end-of-day swollen look).
That matters because most LED benefits take weeks. CryoGlow gives you a reason to keep showing up while the long-term results build.
Who it flatters most:
- Puffy under-eyes, stress face, sleep-deprived face
- Acne + redness cycles (especially when breakouts pop up unpredictably)
- People who like “modes” because it feels guided and less boring
Where people tap out:
- If you hate device bulk, fan noise, or “gadget maintenance,” it can feel like work
Solawave mask feels like: “quiet, quick, consistent.”
Solawave’s strength is the opposite: it’s simple, flexible, and fast.
And importantly, Solawave publishes the kind of numbers shoppers obsess over—irradiance and fluence—which makes it easier to feel confident you’re getting a meaningful dose in a short window.
Who it flatters most:
- “I’ll do it if it’s 3 minutes” people (busy, ADHD routines, bedtime crashers)
- Anti-aging + tone evening goals without the “blue light daily” mindset
- Anyone who prefers soft silicone over hard-shell masks
Where people tap out:
- If your #1 issue is under-eye puffiness, Solawave won’t scratch that itch the way CryoGlow does (no cooling).
Which one should you buy? (simple chooser)
Choose Shark CryoGlow if…
- You care about under-eye puffiness more than anything.
- You want one device for acne + aging + general glow.
- You’ll stay consistent only if you get instant gratification from a routine.
Choose Solawave Wrinkle Retreat Pro if…
- You want an anti-aging LED mask that’s fast and low-friction.
- You like seeing published irradiance/fluence and LED counts.
- You’re mostly focused on tone, texture, and fine lines, not puffy eyes.
How to get results faster (the routine people skip)
If you do either mask “whenever you remember,” you’ll think it doesn’t work.
Do this instead:
- Cleanse → fully dry skin
- Mask session (stick to the brand schedule)
- Moisturizer after
- Take a baseline photo today, same lighting, same angle. Repeat at week 4 and week 8.
Important: Shark’s own FDA-cleared materials include dose details and suggest structured use; that’s the backbone of consistency.
Pros and cons (real, not filler)
Shark CryoGlow: Pros
- Under-eye cooling = instantly satisfying de-puff effect
- Multi-mode design makes it easier to target acne vs aging vs maintenance
- Strong documentation around wavelengths/dosing (FDA + brand materials)
Shark CryoGlow: Cons
- Bulk and fan noise can reduce “lazy day” adherence
- Blue light is great for breakouts, but not everyone wants it frequently (especially PIH-prone users)
Solawave Wrinkle Retreat Pro: Pros
- 3-minute sessions are almost impossible to skip
- Publishes irradiance/fluence, which many brands don’t
- Flexible silicone design tends to feel more comfortable than hard-shell masks
Solawave Wrinkle Retreat Pro: Cons
- No under-eye cooling (so less immediate “I look better right now” payoff)
- Built primarily for anti-aging/tone; if acne is your main concern, you may miss dedicated acne-first design
FAQ: Solwave Mask vs Shark CryoGlow
Does Shark CryoGlow work better than the Solawave mask?
It depends on your goal. For puffiness + multi-goal routines, CryoGlow tends to “feel” more effective because of the cooling and mode variety. For anti-aging consistency, Solawave can win simply because 3 minutes is easier to repeat.
How long does it take to see results with either mask?
LED results are typically weeks, not days. Reviews and clinical-style documentation often reference meaningful changes around 4–8+ weeks with consistent use.
Is Solawave actually “strong enough” if it’s only 3 minutes?
Short doesn’t automatically mean weak. Solawave explicitly states its fluence is based on a 3-minute dose and publishes irradiance/fluence numbers—meaning the session length is designed around delivering a targeted energy dose quickly.
Is blue light safe for everyone?
Blue light can help with acne, but if you’re prone to hyperpigmentation (especially after inflammation), be cautious with frequency and irritation triggers. If you’re unsure, treat blue as “as-needed,” not “all the time.”
Can I use retinol or acids with these masks?
Common best practice: LED on clean, dry skin, then apply skincare after. If you’re sensitive or starting actives, don’t introduce everything at once—irritation is the fastest way to quit the routine.
Which mask is better for sensitive skin?
If your sensitivity is tied to redness/irritation, many people prefer the simplest routine they can stick with. Solawave’s quick sessions and silicone design can feel gentler, while CryoGlow’s cooling can calm the under-eye area—yet its bulk and blue-light options may be more “stimulating” depending on how you use it.
Bottom line
If you want the mask that changes how you look today (puffiness) while building long-term LED benefits, Shark CryoGlow is the better buy.
If you want the mask that’s so fast and easy you’ll actually do it for months, and you like a brand that publishes real dose metrics, Solawave Wrinkle Retreat Pro is the smarter, calmer choice.
Most people should choose based on habit, not hype:
- Puffy/tired under-eyes → CryoGlow
- Anti-aging consistency + minimal friction → Solawave
Other Interesting Articles
- The Ordinary Azelaic Acid vs The Inkey List: Which Affordable Formula Is Right for You?
- The Ordinary Azelaic Acid vs Paula’s Choice: Which Formula Deserves a Place in Your Routine?
- The Ordinary Azelaic Acid vs Naturium Azelaic Acid: Which One Wins the Glow Game?
- The Ordinary Azelaic Acid vs Anua Azelaic Acid: Which Deserves a Spot in Your Routine?
About LuxuryShimmer
LuxuryShimmer breaks down beauty tech the way you’d explain it to a friend: what matters, what doesn’t, and what you’ll realistically keep using.